Judge approves extension of Guard deployment ban in Chicago pending Supreme Court ruling

President Donald Trump’s attempts Army deployment In Democratic-led cities — over the objections of mayors and state governors — it has brought a dizzying array of court challenges and overlapping rulings.

While the US Supreme Court is considering paving the way for the National Guard In chicagoa federal appeals court is hearing arguments in California Governor Gavin Newsom’s challenge to troop deployment In Los Angeles. It’s also possible that Guard troops could soon be on the ground in Portland, Oregon, waiting Legal developments there.

Here’s what to know about legal efforts to block or deploy the National Guard to various cities.

A judge weighs in on guard in Chicago while awaiting a Supreme Court ruling

A federal judge in Chicago has already banned the deployment of Guard forces in the Chicago area For two weeks. On Wednesday, Judge April Perry agreed to extend that order for 30 days. But she said each party could discuss the extension further before meeting again at 3pm local time, noting they would not be able to issue another extension.

However, anything it does could be moot if the US Supreme Court rules in the meantime.

Lawyers representing the Trump administration said in court filings Tuesday that they would agree to potentially extending the publication ban by 30 days. However, they are continuing to ask the US Supreme Court to intervene. the Trump administration It is pushing for an emergency order allowing the deployment of Guard forces.

The Attorney General, Dr. John Sawyer said in a Supreme Court filing Tuesday: “Every day this inappropriate TRO remains in effect imposes grave and irreparable harm on the executive branch.”

Lawyers representing Chicago and Illinois asked the Supreme Court to continue the publication ban, calling it a “dramatic step.”

The Guard’s deployment in Portland is also in limbo

An appeals court said Monday that Trump could take command of 200 Oregon National Guard troops, but a separate court order still prevents him from doing so. Actually published they.

US District Judge Karen Emmergut, a Trump appointee, issued two temporary restraining orders earlier this month. One of them blocked Trump from calling in Oregon state troopers so he could send them to Portland. The other prevented him from sending any Guard members to Oregon at all after he tried to evade the first order by deploying California troops instead.

The Justice Department appealed the first order, and in a 2-1 ruling Monday, a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the administration.

However, Immergut’s second order remains in effect, so no troops may be deployed immediately.

The case is still before the courts.

California legal battle goes before appeals panel

On Wednesday, a panel of the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena is scheduled to hear arguments related to Trump’s deployment of Guard forces in Los Angeles.

A district court found that the administration violated federal law when it sent troops to Los Angeles in early June after protests over Trump’s anti-immigration crackdown.

Justice Charles Breyer gave Newsom an early victory in the case on June 13 when he ordered control of California Guard members returned to the state. But in an emergency ruling, A court The commission sided with the Trump administration, allowing the troops to remain in the hands of the federal government while the lawsuit unfolded.

The appeals court will consider whether to overturn Breyer’s order in June.

The same three-judge panel is also handling the Trump administration’s appeal of Breyer’s Sept. 2 ruling, which found that the president violated the ruling. Boss County Codean 1878 law prohibiting military enforcement of local laws.

The groups aim to stop the deployment of the National Guard in D.C

In Charleston, West Virginia, a state court hearing is scheduled for Friday in a lawsuit filed by two groups seeking to block the deployment of the state National Guard to Washington, D.C. More than 300 Guard members have been in the nation’s capital to support Trump’s initiative since late August.

Democrats file lawsuit to stop National Guard deployment to Memphis

In Tennessee, Democratic elected officials filed a lawsuit last Friday to stop the Guard’s continued deployment in Memphis. They said Republican Gov. Bill Lee, at Trump’s behest, violated the state constitution, which says the Guard can be called during “rebellion or invasion” — but only with the blessing of state lawmakers.

since Arriving October 10thTroops patrolled areas of downtown Memphis, including near the famous pyramid, wearing military fatigues and protective vests labeled “Military Police,” with rifles in weapons holsters. Officials said the Guard members did not have the authority to arrest.